From budget to control, without retyping
The approved budget becomes the basis for cost control, with chapters and line items preserved. Nobody has to rebuild the structure in a separate sheet.
In a normal ERP, the centre is the product or the client. In construction, the centre is the site: each one has its own budget, measurement records, subcontractors, deadlines and margin. Two sites of the same type rarely run the same way.
That is why almost every company in the sector ends up with the same arrangement: an invoicing package, an accounting package, and the real site control in a spreadsheet only one person knows how to maintain. It works until the company has more sites than fit in that person head.
The budget was built on an expected cost. During the job, extra work comes in, subcontracts overrun and hours go uncounted. When the accounts close, three months later, there is nothing left to do. And the next site is budgeted on the same assumptions, because the real variance was never measured.
The goal is not digitising the whole company. It is controlling what decides margin: budget against real cost, measured while the job is still running.
The approved budget becomes the basis for cost control, with chapters and line items preserved. Nobody has to rebuild the structure in a separate sheet.
Material, labour and subcontracting charged to the site and the work front as they happen, with variance against budget visible during execution.
Measurement records come from what was executed and logged, with a history of quantities and revisions. Disputing a record stops being a memory exercise.
Hours per worker and per work front recorded on location, with a simple interface, so costs enter the system the same day.
We do not replace accounting or invoicing. We connect to them, so that site control and the financial side stop being two separate worlds.
In a sector where contractual disputes are common, the value of a system lies as much in the control as in the evidence it leaves behind.
Start with one pilot site, not the whole company. It is the only way to learn what the system has to do before extending it.
We look at how you budget, how you control costs today and where margin is lost unnoticed. You leave knowing where to start.
Following a real site, from budget to measurement record, with the people doing the work. Prototype of the site screens before code.
System in use on one site, running in parallel with the current method, until the numbers match the spreadsheet.
Remaining sites and additional modules, with the team already used to it and the process validated in the field.
Reference bands upfront. The exact figure is fixed in the proposal, after the on-site study, and does not change midway.
€25,000 to €45,000
Budget, cost per work front, crew hours and invoicing integration. 10 to 16 weeks.
€45,000 to €90,000
The above plus measurement records, subcontracting, procurement and a site app. 16 to 28 weeks.
On proposal
The first 3 months of support are included. After that, ongoing support as the company grows in number of sites.
Free diagnosis, no commitment. We look at your process and come back with a plan covering scope, timeline and investment. Reply within 48 business hours, NDA included by default.
Two minutes to tell us the essentials. We reply within 48 business hours with a first read on your case and, if it makes sense, a proposed session.
Every vertical has its own challenges. See how we approach other sectors where we have proven experience.