Data extraction from invoices and documents
Invoices, delivery notes and contracts in any format become records in the system, validated against business rules, with anything unusual flagged for human review.
Classic automation works well while everything is predictable: if A happens, do B. It breaks on the first document in a different format, the first email worded another way, the first exception nobody planned for. And exceptions are most of the manual work that is left.
With AI, the flow copes with input that varies: it reads an invoice in any format, works out what an email is about, classifies a request by its content rather than by keywords. Business rules stay explicit; what AI adds is tolerance to variation.
There is always someone copying figures from a PDF into the system, updating a spreadsheet that someone else also maintains, forwarding emails to the right person. It is not hard work, it is work that never ends, and it grows at the same rate as the business. Hiring for it is expensive and nobody wants the job.
We deliberately pick back office processes with an obvious metric: that is where the return shows up fastest and is easiest to prove.
Invoices, delivery notes and contracts in any format become records in the system, validated against business rules, with anything unusual flagged for human review.
What gets agreed by email stops depending on someone remembering to log it. The flow reads the thread, updates the deal in the CRM and schedules the follow-up.
Whatever arrives by email or form is classified by subject and urgency and routed to the right person, with the simple cases getting an automatic reply.
Instead of someone pulling information from three systems at month end, the report is produced on whatever schedule you set, and flags when an indicator moves outside the expected range.
Automation lives in the joints between systems, which is exactly where off-the-shelf integrations tend to stop. We connect through an API where there is one and custom-built where there is not.
An automated flow that fails silently is worse than manual work. That is why the design starts by defining what the system decides alone and what it does not.
One process at a time, chosen by return rather than by technical convenience.
We measure what each candidate process costs today and pick where to start with you. You leave with an estimate of hours saved.
A map of the process as it really is, exceptions included, and a definition of what needs human review. Scope, timeline and investment fixed.
The flow goes live after being tested with real documents and cases from your business, with human review in the first weeks.
With the first one measured, the next is chosen. This is where it starts to make sense to talk about agents linking several processes together.
Reference bands upfront. The exact figure is fixed in the proposal, after the diagnosis, and does not change midway.
€7,500 to €15,000
One flow in production, connected to real systems, delivered in 4 to 6 weeks. The figure varies mostly with the number of integrations.
€15,000 to €35,000
Three to five flows linked together, with a monitoring dashboard and exception handling.
On proposal
The first 3 months of support are included. After that, continuous evolution as the processes change.
Free diagnosis, no commitment. We look at your process and come back with a plan covering scope, timeline and investment. Reply within 48 business hours, NDA included by default.
Two minutes to tell us the essentials. We reply within 48 business hours with a first read on your case and, if it makes sense, a proposed session.
Every vertical has its own challenges. See how we approach other sectors where we have proven experience.